Derecho al olvido


On 26 November 2014, the EU Article 29 Data Protection Working Party published guidelines on how the decision should be implemented. Google published the report of its advisory committee on how the decision should be implemented on February 5, 2015. Their advisory committee also includes Luciano Florida Professor of Philosophy and Information Ethics at the University of Oxford , Frank La Rue derecho al olvido.

Who worked as the UN Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression from August 2008 to August 2014 and Jimmy Wales , the founder of Wikipedia. The committee recommended that only national links be removed, not global links, and that publishers be notified of removals and have the right to challenge them.

On February 7, 2015 , Amjad reported that Isabelle Falque-Pierrotin  [ fry ] , chair of the Article 29 Working Group , has warned Google of legal action if it does not heed its warnings about how Google controls the regulation. The group wants Google to stop notifying publishers and remove its links globally.

See also

  • Boil Lindqvist v The Prosecutor’s Office in Jönköping (Lindqvist)
  • Melvin v. Reid (US case law)
  • Florida Star v. BJF (US Case Law)
  • The Streisand Effect – Filing lawsuits to protect privacy can result in significant media attention
  • LICRA v. Yahoo!

Also read: mario costeja

References and sources

  1. “EU court upholds right to be forgotten in Google case” . BBC News . May 13, 2014.
  2. “Press Release No. 70/14 (Decision in Case C-131/12)” (PDF) . Court of the European Union .
  3. David Streatfield (13 May 2014). “European Court Lets Users Delete Records Online” . New York Times . Retrieved 14 August 2014 .
  4. Julia Powles (May 15, 2014). “What can we save from the right to be forgotten” . Archived from the original on May 16, 2014 . Retrieved May 16, 2014 .
  5. “Decision of the European Court in case C‑131/12 ( Cotija )” . Court of the European Union .
  6. Baldry, Tony ; Hams, Oliver. “The right to be forgotten” . 1 Essex Court.
  7. The announcements in question: “Sunhats d’Immobles” . La Vanguard . 19 January 1998. p. 23.(in Catalan ), accessed 16 May 2014. Translation: “Property auctions … the undivided parts of the house at 8 Montseny St. belonging to Mario Cotija González and Alicia Vargas cot …
  8. “Fact sheet on the ‘right to be forgotten’ judgment (Case C-131/12)” (PDF) . European Commission .
  9. Vassal-Adams, Guy. “Juhtumi comment: Google Spain SL, Google Inc versus Egencia Española de Protection de Dato’s, Mario Cotija González” . . Maatrikskambrid .
  10. Tobin, Jeffrey. “The Comfort of Oblivion” . The New Yorker .
  11. Frantziou, Eleni. “Further developments in the right to be forgotten: the ECJ judgment in Case C-131/12, Google Spain, SL, Google Inc versus Egencia Espanola de Protection de Dato’s ” . . Overview of the Human Rights Act.
  12. Jay, Rosemary. “European Court of Justice Advocate General issues opinion in Google search case” . Hinton & Williams LLP . Archived from the original on April 11, 2015.
  13. “Press Release No. 77/13 (Advocate’s Opinion in Case C-131/12)” (PDF) . Court of the European Union .
  14. “Proposal submitted by lawyer Nile Jääskinen on June 25, 2013 – Case C‑131/12” . Court of the European Union .
  15. “European Court upholds Google’s right to delete search items” . Hinton & Williams LLP .
  16. “Decision of the European Court in case C-101/01 ( Lindqvist )” . Court of the European Union .
  17. Google to create ‘right to be forgotten’ form after EU ruling BBC News , 30 May 2014. Accessed 30 May 2014.
  18. “Google Gives Right to Remove Personal Data from Search Results” . Hinton & Williams LLP .
  19. Powell, Rose (31 May 2014). “Google gets 12,000 requests to be forgotten on first day” . Sydney Morning Herald . Retrieved May 31, 2014 .
  20. Colbeck, Jennifer. “Google removes revenge porn from search results” . . Slate .
  21. Eng., James. “Consumer watchdog: Google should extend ‘right to be forgotten’ to US.” . NBC News .
  22. Powles, Julia (21 May 2014). “What did the media miss with the ‘right to be forgotten’ coverage?” . Guardian .
  23. Hurting, Niko. “Can a search engine be private by default?” . . Crinoline.
  24. “Google Spain SL v. Spanish Data Protection Agency” . . Harvard steadies elevate .
  25. “Guidelines for the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union” Google Spain SL and Google Inc. versus Egencia Española de Protection de Dato’s (AEPD) and Mario Cotija González for the implementation of “C – 131/12” (PDF) . . European Commission .
  26. “Implementation of the right to be forgotten: The Article 29 Working Party speaks”. London School of Economics .
  27. “Google Forgotten Law Advisory Committee (Report)” .
  28. Florida, Luciano. “Should you have the right to be forgotten on Google? Nationally, yes. Globally, no,” . WorldPost .
  29. Dean, James. “Respect European laws, Google warned” . Times .

Also read: sharenting significado

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *